A-life discovered on mars!!

topic posted Fri, May 7, 2004 - 1:25 PM by  Sal
Share/Save/Bookmark
Advertisement
Here is a quote from Cornell University astronomer Steve Squyres in reference to The mars rover Opportunity (emphisis mine).

"There are cliffs the rover could fall over and *die* if we aren't careful," said Squyres. "We are gong to proceed carefully and methodically."

www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/sp...er/index.html

He could of said "be destroyed" but he said "die". Of course, this can be dismissed as common anthropomorphization, but how many generations of rovers will it take until it becomes more correct to say die than destroyed? 1? 5? 100? Never?
posted by:
Sal
offline Sal
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • Re: A-life discovered on mars!!

    Sat, June 12, 2004 - 1:56 PM
    Personally, I think we should send machines capable of building infrastructure as soon as possible, if we ever want to colonize, and self-replicating machines would be an elegant way to accomplish that.

    Your philosophical/linguistic question is a fun one, though. The classic cogsci example of this is that a thermostat can be most easily described in terms of intent. Often, the people using a machine have sound cognitive reasons for anthropomorphizing: a lot of our brain power is wired toward socialization, so why not use those patterns to interface with your equipment?

    It's tough to say whether our perception of intentionality is just convenient pattern-matching, or if our whole concept of intent is just a pragmatic device we have developed to deal with responsive systems. But as an engineer, I certainly think of almost anything I've made as "alive" whenever it's in working order.

Recent topics in "Artificial Life (alife)"

Topic Author Replies Last Post
Artificial Life Demo that Dies? ROb 1 May 19, 2007
transhumanist social network at www.transhumanists.org Christopher 0 May 18, 2007
This way to the rabbit hole! Unsubscribed 0 May 6, 2007
Hybrid life Emiglio 3 September 6, 2006